This morning we got our first glimpse of the accommodation that asylum seekers who are flown to Rwanda will stay in.
The press pack were taken to a guest house built in 2014 about a mile from the centre of the capital, Kigali.
Called the Hope Guest House, it is intended to fulfil the migrants’ basic needs while they wait for their claims to be processed.
Live: Boris Johnson announces plan to send migrants to Rwanda amid backlash
There is a communal eating area where people will be served three meals a day, while there are 12 toilets and five showers for around 100 people and small bedrooms, which are around 12ft by 12ft with two beds in each.
It’s stripped back and basic, but comfortable enough, which is what you’d expect.
What I found most interesting about being shown around the building though, was what we didn’t see and the questions we didn’t have answered.
Britain has a growing backlog of asylum claims which has reached £1.5bn a year and if the government wants to use these accommodation blocks as a backstop, it will need to find more of them and scale-up fast.
Government officials who took us around the accommodation in Kigali showed us a mini replica of what the block will look like when it’s finished.
They’re planning to build two more 50-room blocks in the compound – but when we asked when those would be finished, we didn’t get a definite answer.
There is no doubt building enough accommodation fit for purpose in Rwanda will be a huge challenge alongside the considerable legal and moral challenges this proposal will entail.
The Royal Navy will take over responsibility for dealing with people crossing the Channel, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Thursday.
Speaking at a news conference in Kigali, Home Secretary Priti Patel said the new policy is the “biggest overhaul” of the UK’s asylum system in “decades”.
“The global approach to asylum and migration is broken,” she said.
Read more:
Minister defends plans as “humane step forward” – as charities criticise “cruel and nasty decision” set to cost £1.4bn
Offshore processing of asylum seekers: Is the UK copying Australia’s hardline policy?